The Book and the Disciplines: Histories of the Book

Syllabus

This seminar is an inquiry into the close relations among the history of the book, the history of reading and the discussion about the disciplines. This is not to say that there is a chain of causality among these three disparate elements. Rather, they are part of an entwined series of discussions surrounding material, intellectual, and cognitive questions that set in motion changes in the technologies of the book, in the practices of reading, and in the ways disciplines are devised within and without the academic world.

Books transmit content –but not only. Furthermore, they have always been epistemological devices –that is, artifacts that suggest ways to know things (skills, disciplines, etc.). They have always constituted material concepts with which to respond to complex questions about cognition, study, dissemination of knowledge, interaction, dialogue, debate, indexing, order, search and research –at local and global levels, among many different graphic and alphabetic traditions. Book is a very large denomination that includes many different techniques ranging from unique handwritten objects to manually, mechanically, or digitally reproduced  ones.The history of the book encompasses the study of the radical variety of researches devised to achieve material ways to produce and disseminate knowledge that are not only verbal, but also multimedia: the history of the book is, as well, the history of the combination and interplay, on the same portable and archivable object, of text, images, music, pieces of machinery (vovelles), or even the sacred, the talismanic, and the totemic.

Last Updated 2 years ago


Pre-Requisites

This seminar is cross-listed with the Institute for Comparative Literature and Society.

Bibliography

  • Aiden, Erez, and Jean-Baptiste Michel. Uncharted: Big Data As a Lens on Human Culture. , 2013. Print.
  • Bernardus Silvestris. Poetic Works. Ed. and trad. Winthrop WetherbeeCambridge, MA: Harvard UP, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, 2015. Print.
  • Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.
  • Bouza Alvarez, Fernando. Corre Manuscrito: Una Historia Cultural Del Siglo De Oro. Marcial Pons Historia, 2001.
  • Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd S. Presner, and Jeffrey T. Schnapp. Digital Humanities. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2012. Print.
  • Casanova, Pascale, and M B. DeBevoise. The World Republic of Letters. , 2004.
  • Certeau, Michel , and Steven Rendall. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
  • Cevolini, Alberto. De Arte Excerpendi: Imparare a Dimenticare Nella Modernità. Firenze: L. S. Olschki, 2006.
  • Chartier, Roger, and Lydia G. Cochrane. The Author’s Hand and the Printer’s Mind. , 2014. Print.
  • Chaytor, H J. From Script to Print: An Introduction to Medieval Vernacular Literature. Cambridge: W. Heffer, 1950. Print.
  • Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October 59 (1992): 3-7.
  • Derrida, Jacques, and Eric Prenowitz. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Derrida, Jacques. Mal d’archive: une impression Freudienne. Paris: Galilée, 1995.
  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. Print.
  • Elster, Jon. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
  • Freshwater, Helen. “The Allure of the Archive.” Poetics Today 24, no. 4 (2003): 729-758.
  • Grafton, Anthony, and Joanna Weinberg. “i Have Always Loved the Holy Tongue”: Isaac Casaubon, the Jews, and a Forgotten Chapter in Renaissance Scholarship. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.
  • Grafton, Anthony, and Megan H. Williams. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.
  • Hayles, Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1999. Print.
  • Hayles, N Katherine. “After Shocks: Posthuman Ambivalence.” postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies 1, no. 1-2 (2010): doi:10.1057/pmed.2010.28.
  • Holsinger, B. “Of Pigs and Parchment: Medieval Studies and the Coming of the Animal.” PMLA 124, no. 2 (2009): 616-623.
  • Hugh of Saint Victor. Didascalicon.
  • Illich, Ivan. In the Vineyard of the Text: A Commentary to Hugh’s Didascalicon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  • Joan Lluís Vives. De causae corruptionis artis. De tradendis disciplinis. Vives, Juan L, Foster Watson, and Francesco Cordasco. Vives: On Education. Totowa, N.J: Rowman and Littlefield, 1971. OR Vives, Juan L, Tristan Vigliano. De Disciplinis =: Savoir Et Enseigner. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2013.
  • Jones, Steven E. The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. , 2014. Print.
  • Kay, S. “Legible Skins: Animals and the Ethics of Medieval Reading.” postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies 2, no. 1 (2011): 13-32.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
  • Law, Graham. Serializing Fiction in the Victorian Press. Basingstoke, Hampshire/New York: Palgrave 2000.
  • Maimonides, Moses, and Shlomo Pines. The Guide of the Perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.
  • McKenzie. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • Nakládalová, Iveta. La Lectura Docta En La Primera Edad Moderna (1450-1650). Madrid: Abada, 2013.
  • Nei Richards. “The Electronic Panopticon”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. March 16 (2015). http://chronicle.com/article/The-Electronic-Panopticon/228419/?key=TGxzd1ExZXdPZH8yYztEa24DO3I4ZRl3NXgcYntwbl9QFw%3D%3D==
  • Suber, Peter. Open Access. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2012. Internet resource.
  • Vismann, Cornelia, and Geoffrey Winthrop-Young. Files: Law and Media Technology. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ Press, 2008.
  • Vismann, Cornelia. “Flashback and Eyewitness.” Parallax 14.4 (November, 2008): 90–100.
  • Willinsky, John. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2006. Print.